At the US Supreme Court, sometimes they all get it right on a truly important issue, as they did on Monday: Justices Rein in Police on GPS Trackers (Wall Street Journal). See the court's opinion and the two concurring opinions in the court case here.
Boston attorney Steven Ballard on recent developments in divorce & family law.
Sunday, January 29, 2012
Friday, December 23, 2011
Divorce Books for Little Kids
Many will soon be giving or receiving holiday gift cards for a certain megabook chain or amazon.com. So maybe now's a good time for some recommendations of books about divorce. I just created two listamania lists on amazon.com. One of them is a list of my recommended books for small children about divorce, and the other one is for a couple of books I recommend avoiding. Below you will find the substance of both lists and my comments. Happy Holidays!
OK, now here are a few books to avoid:

| These are good books for divorcing parents or other caregivers with children of preschool age. Read them first to see if they make sense for you and your own child. |
![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| ||||||||||
![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| ||||
![]() |
| ||||
![]() |
| ||||
![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| ||||
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
New Probate and Family Court Rules
Revised rules for the Probate and Family Court of Massachusetts will go into effect January 2, 2012. The new rules can be found on the website for the Massachusetts Trial Court Law Libraries, as reported today in their blog:
For information about Massachusetts divorce and family law, see the divorce and family law page of my law firm website.
- New Supplemental Rules of the Probate Court, which will replace the General Rules of the Probate Court and current Supplemental Rules of the Probate Court on January 2, 2012
- Amended Uniform Practices of the Probate and Family Court, effective January 2, 2012
- Amended Rules of Civil Procedure, effective January 2, 2012
For information about Massachusetts divorce and family law, see the divorce and family law page of my law firm website.
Saturday, December 17, 2011
Kobe Bryant Headed for Divorce
There's bound to be a bit of schadenfreude here in New England, as we Boston Celtics fans absorb the news of the impending divorce of our nemesis Kobe Bryant out in LA. But any divorce like this one - which involves two small children, ages five and eight - should be no cause for celebration.
On the bright side, it appears that this will be handled quickly and without painful public drama. According to both TMZ and the LA Times, Kobe's wife Vanessa signed her petition on December 1, Kobe penned his response on December 7, papers were filed with the court on December 16, and the couple has already issued a joint statement late yesterday that they have come to an agreement privately through counsel and will have their divorce judgment entered next year.
According to TMZ, Kobe has already vacated their huge Newport Coast mansion, which wife Vanessa is to keep in their deal. It is clear from the filings, as released by TMZ, that Vanessa has claimed some jewelry as her separate property (including, presumably, the multi-million dollar ring Kobe gave her after his infidelity with the Colorado woman who accused him of rape back in 2003), that they did not have a prenuptial agreement, that she is seeking spousal support, and that both have requested joint physical and legal custody of their two girls.
Even though California has tightened up its rules for prenuptial agreements (following the Barry Bonds divorce, which was thought to have been unfair to his Swedish wife), it is possible in California to waive the right to share in community property and to limit the right to spousal support in a prenuptial agreement. But Kobe Bryant, by failing to insist upon a prenuptial agreement at the time he and Vanessa married - over ten years ago, while they were very young, at the very beginning of what would become a very successful NBA career - will thus end up sharing a lot more, in both assets and in ongoing support obligations, of his earnings with Vanessa than he would likely have been required to do.
That is because the overwhelming bulk of their assets was accumulated during the past ten years of their marriage and Kobe's tenure with the NBA. Consequently, they will likely be splitting their assets in half as it will all be "community property" - except for the jewelry she can claim as separate property because it was a gift to her. That could mean she would walk away with slightly more than he does (on account of these expensive gifts she listed as separate property), and then continue to collect child support and alimony which will be tied to his continued high earnings.
But given estimates of their net worth in the $200-300 million range, and many more millions to come - through Kobe's expected NBA salary of $25 million plus endorsements for the next several years - the Bryants do not need our financial sympathy.
Let's just hope the girls will be okay with their parents living in separate lavish homes. And of course, go Celtics!
For information about Massachusetts divorce and family law, see the divorce and family law page of my law firm website.
According to TMZ, Kobe has already vacated their huge Newport Coast mansion, which wife Vanessa is to keep in their deal. It is clear from the filings, as released by TMZ, that Vanessa has claimed some jewelry as her separate property (including, presumably, the multi-million dollar ring Kobe gave her after his infidelity with the Colorado woman who accused him of rape back in 2003), that they did not have a prenuptial agreement, that she is seeking spousal support, and that both have requested joint physical and legal custody of their two girls.
Even though California has tightened up its rules for prenuptial agreements (following the Barry Bonds divorce, which was thought to have been unfair to his Swedish wife), it is possible in California to waive the right to share in community property and to limit the right to spousal support in a prenuptial agreement. But Kobe Bryant, by failing to insist upon a prenuptial agreement at the time he and Vanessa married - over ten years ago, while they were very young, at the very beginning of what would become a very successful NBA career - will thus end up sharing a lot more, in both assets and in ongoing support obligations, of his earnings with Vanessa than he would likely have been required to do.
That is because the overwhelming bulk of their assets was accumulated during the past ten years of their marriage and Kobe's tenure with the NBA. Consequently, they will likely be splitting their assets in half as it will all be "community property" - except for the jewelry she can claim as separate property because it was a gift to her. That could mean she would walk away with slightly more than he does (on account of these expensive gifts she listed as separate property), and then continue to collect child support and alimony which will be tied to his continued high earnings.
But given estimates of their net worth in the $200-300 million range, and many more millions to come - through Kobe's expected NBA salary of $25 million plus endorsements for the next several years - the Bryants do not need our financial sympathy.
Let's just hope the girls will be okay with their parents living in separate lavish homes. And of course, go Celtics!
For information about Massachusetts divorce and family law, see the divorce and family law page of my law firm website.
Christopher Hitchens, Rest in Peace
With the passing of Christopher Hitchens, we have lost a most brilliant, provocative writer and thinker. He was active and influential on both sides of the pond. I share my English brother John Bolch's admiration for the man and his writing. See John's post and the video contained therein: Family Lore: Christopher Hitchens, 1949 - 2011.
Friday, December 9, 2011
Lindsay Lohan's Judge Gives the Gift of Porn
Photos from Lindsay Lohan's much-hyped nude photo spread, to be officially released in next week's Playboy, leaked out on the internet today. Playboy claims to fear the leak may negatively affect sales of the magazine, which will need to be phenomenal enough to justify its nearly million dollar payout to Lindsay.
But for this holiday gift of porn we really have a criminal court judge to thank. Many stockings can be stuffed, just in time for Christmas, with the Lindsay spread thanks to one Judge Stephanie Sautner. Sautner's the judge who last month allowed Lindsay Lohan to delay her scheduled stint in jail so she could do her photo shoot first and not jeopardize her contract with Playboy.
As TMZ put it, "justice is not only blind...sometimes it's stark naked."
But for this holiday gift of porn we really have a criminal court judge to thank. Many stockings can be stuffed, just in time for Christmas, with the Lindsay spread thanks to one Judge Stephanie Sautner. Sautner's the judge who last month allowed Lindsay Lohan to delay her scheduled stint in jail so she could do her photo shoot first and not jeopardize her contract with Playboy.
As TMZ put it, "justice is not only blind...sometimes it's stark naked."
Thursday, December 8, 2011
Father Absence Affects Sons More than Daughters?
A new working paper recently discussed in the Freakonomics blog, and which looks at the relationship between the absence of fathers from the home and juvenile delinquency, suggests that the presence of fathers, while beneficial for both sons and daughters, may be much more beneficial for sons than daughters. The working paper finds, among other things, that "adolescent boys engage in more delinquent behavior if there is no father figure in their lives. However, adolescent girls' behavior is largely independent of the presence (or absence) of their fathers."
Of course, we should always view claims of findings from such social "science" reports with a healthy dose of skepticism. A commenter on the Freakonomics blog named Todd makes the good point that this new study may be missing some important factors, especially as previous biological evidence shows father absence early in life may affect daughters by dramatically altering the age at which they get their first period. I would add that longitudinal studies in the United States and New Zealand have previously shown that father absence is strongly correlated with a higher risk for daughters of early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy.
However differently father absence may affect daughters versus sons, what is clear is that father presence has positive effects and father absence has negative effects - that is the common denominator of all studies to date, including this latest one. And while that may seem self-evident to most of us, it is not uniformly understood or believed due to the sad pervasiveness of men bashing in certain circles.
Father absence and its effects on children - both sons and daughters - should concern us all, as we have gone from a nation, here in the US, with 8 percent of children living in mother-only homes in 1960 to one with fully 23 percent living in such homes in 2010, according to the US Census bureau. I hope more such studies will be done, and that more of us will pay attention to them and the issues they raise.
For information about Massachusetts divorce and family law, see the divorce and family law page of my law firm website.
Of course, we should always view claims of findings from such social "science" reports with a healthy dose of skepticism. A commenter on the Freakonomics blog named Todd makes the good point that this new study may be missing some important factors, especially as previous biological evidence shows father absence early in life may affect daughters by dramatically altering the age at which they get their first period. I would add that longitudinal studies in the United States and New Zealand have previously shown that father absence is strongly correlated with a higher risk for daughters of early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy.
However differently father absence may affect daughters versus sons, what is clear is that father presence has positive effects and father absence has negative effects - that is the common denominator of all studies to date, including this latest one. And while that may seem self-evident to most of us, it is not uniformly understood or believed due to the sad pervasiveness of men bashing in certain circles.
Father absence and its effects on children - both sons and daughters - should concern us all, as we have gone from a nation, here in the US, with 8 percent of children living in mother-only homes in 1960 to one with fully 23 percent living in such homes in 2010, according to the US Census bureau. I hope more such studies will be done, and that more of us will pay attention to them and the issues they raise.
For information about Massachusetts divorce and family law, see the divorce and family law page of my law firm website.
Saturday, October 15, 2011
Divorce Parties
Divorce is not only the end of a marriage, but also the beginning of a new life, and for some people, even a cause for celebration. As I recently discussed here, some newly divorced or divorcing individuals have begun to mark the end of their marriages with some form or other of leisure travel.
Well, even if you prefer not to travel, you can celebrate your new status in a more public way right in your hometown: you can throw a divorce party for all your friends. Divorce parties are not new, as they have been going on for some time, but the ones I have known about have been relatively private, small, informal affairs. However, in Los Angeles at least, an industry has sprung up to cater to an apparently growing demand for divorce parties there. Maybe this is a trend that will catch on elsewhere.
For information about Massachusetts divorce and family law, see the divorce and family law page of my law firm website.
Well, even if you prefer not to travel, you can celebrate your new status in a more public way right in your hometown: you can throw a divorce party for all your friends. Divorce parties are not new, as they have been going on for some time, but the ones I have known about have been relatively private, small, informal affairs. However, in Los Angeles at least, an industry has sprung up to cater to an apparently growing demand for divorce parties there. Maybe this is a trend that will catch on elsewhere.
For information about Massachusetts divorce and family law, see the divorce and family law page of my law firm website.
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
Testosterone and Fatherhood
A scientific study done in the Philippines suggests that men who become fathers have hormonal changes that may help them to adapt to their new role - i.e., they have a drop in testosterone upon becoming fathers. That should come as good news to those of us who already know that men can and do make excellent, nurturing parents, and who envision a world of increasing gender equity, both at work and at home.
Gender stereotypes and prejudices, backed by faulty biological assumptions, have inevitably resulted from thousands of years of history in a predominantly patriarchal culture (with fathers in the bread-winning role and mothers in the primary parenting role), and they continue to stand in the way of men in search of parenting equity at home, even as women have made tremendous strides in the workplace over the past fifty years. This scientific study provides hope to the optimist in me that parenting equity and equality in the home will eventually catch up to, and parallel, the rapidly advancing workplace equality women have achieved, and are continuing to achieving, both in this country and throughout the developed world.
New York Times: In Study, Fatherhood Leads to Drop in Testosterone, excerpt:
This is probably not the news most fathers want to hear.
Testosterone, that most male of hormones, takes a dive after a man becomes a parent. And the more he gets involved in caring for his children — changing diapers, jiggling the boy or girl on his knee, reading “Goodnight Moon” for the umpteenth time — the lower his testosterone drops.
So says the first large study measuring testosterone in men when they were single and childless and several years after they had children. Experts say the research has implications for understanding the biology of fatherhood, hormone roles in men and even health issues like prostate cancer.
“The real take-home message,” said Peter Ellison, a professor of human evolutionary biology at Harvard who was not involved in the study, is that “male parental care is important. It’s important enough that it’s actually shaped the physiology of men.”
“Unfortunately,” Dr. Ellison added, “I think American males have been brainwashed” to believe lower testosterone means that “maybe you’re a wimp, that it’s because you’re not really a man.
“My hope would be that this kind of research has an impact on the American male. It would make them realize that we’re meant to be active fathers and participate in the care of our offspring.”
The study, experts say, suggests that men’s bodies evolved hormonal systems that helped them commit to their families once children were born. It also suggests that men’s behavior can affect hormonal signals their bodies send, not just that hormones influence behavior. And, experts say, it underscores that mothers were meant to have child care help.
For information about Massachusetts divorce and family law, see the divorce and family law page of my law firm website.
Sunday, October 9, 2011
Third Marriage for Paul McCartney, Third Divorce for Demi Moore
In recent celebrity news, Paul McCartney just got married again in London.
Meanwhile in Hollywood, Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher are apparently headed for divorce.
| Wikipedia photo |
Friday, October 7, 2011
Stevie B, Owing $420K in Child Support, Arrested At Springfield Concert
Stevie B, singer of "Because I Love You" (The Postman Song) and other hits from the 80s and 90s, was arrested in Springfield this past Friday night after his concert at the MassMutual Center and hauled off to jail for an apparent child support debt, to a woman in Agawam, of a whopping $420,000.
According to the Springfield Republican, when Stevie B was apprehended as he was leaving the arena after his show, the arresting officer found him "cooperative but surprised by the arrest" and concerned "that he might miss a weekend gig in Providence, RI."
Stevie B is apparently now regularly residing and working in Vegas. Did he forget about the child support he skipped out on here in Massachusetts? Did he think he was in the clear by now?
Hmmm, reminds me of another music celebrity, Bobby Brown. He too was arrested several years back after returning to his native Massachusetts (from Georgia, in his case) to see his daughter cheerleading, and was hauled off to jail for huge back child support. One of the lessons I derived from this story, as I blogged back then, was:
For information about Massachusetts divorce and family law, see the divorce and family law page of my law firm website.
According to the Springfield Republican, when Stevie B was apprehended as he was leaving the arena after his show, the arresting officer found him "cooperative but surprised by the arrest" and concerned "that he might miss a weekend gig in Providence, RI."
Stevie B is apparently now regularly residing and working in Vegas. Did he forget about the child support he skipped out on here in Massachusetts? Did he think he was in the clear by now?
Hmmm, reminds me of another music celebrity, Bobby Brown. He too was arrested several years back after returning to his native Massachusetts (from Georgia, in his case) to see his daughter cheerleading, and was hauled off to jail for huge back child support. One of the lessons I derived from this story, as I blogged back then, was:
If you happen to become a celebrity when you "grow up" and if you happen to get way behind on your child support, then do not go to visit your daughter as she is cheerleading in public.Perhaps I now should add to that:
...and do not perform a public concert in the very state, and in the nearest city, in which the ex to whom you owe massive child support happens to live.On this past Monday, October 3, TMZ reported that Stevie B was indeed arraigned on Monday, but still remained in custody until able to pay at least $10,000 of what he owes to get out of jail. The Associated Press more recently has reported that he got out of jail on Tuesday by paying $11,000, but Stevie B disputes the amount of the debt. More details, from the the AP story:
On Monday, he agreed to a schedule of payments for approximately $420,000 in child support, including a lump sum payment of $10,000 and weekly payments of $921. His lawyer said he paid an additional $1,000 with the required lump sum and has offered to pay an extra $500 per week.An extra $500 a week toward arrears would be just a tad less than what would be necessary just to pay the 6 percent annual interest that would be assessed on his $400K+ debt (to say nothing of the other 6 percent ordinarily assessed in penalties). I see more lump sum payments and possibly seizure of assets in Stevie B's future.
For information about Massachusetts divorce and family law, see the divorce and family law page of my law firm website.
Thursday, October 6, 2011
Divorce: Hair Loss, Weight Gain, Binge Drinking
We hardly need any more reasons to convince us that divorce is to be avoided if possible. But some recent studies indicate that following divorce women are more likely to lose hair (hat tip to Family Lore) and men are more likely to gain weight. What about the kids, you ask? Well, after their parents split, kids are more likely to become binge drinkers by the time they reach 16.
Could be worse, I guess. It could have been found that after divorce, women are more likely to gain weight and men are more likely to lose hair. After all, we know women really hate to gain weight, and men really hate to lose their hair. But you know, since men as they age are much more likely to lose hair than women anyway, and as women are more likely to have already gained weight during the marriage, there's not really any good news here for those of us who get married and divorced.
I do promise, however, to report any good news when I see it.
For information about Massachusetts divorce and family law, see the divorce and family law page of my law firm website.
Could be worse, I guess. It could have been found that after divorce, women are more likely to gain weight and men are more likely to lose hair. After all, we know women really hate to gain weight, and men really hate to lose their hair. But you know, since men as they age are much more likely to lose hair than women anyway, and as women are more likely to have already gained weight during the marriage, there's not really any good news here for those of us who get married and divorced.
I do promise, however, to report any good news when I see it.
For information about Massachusetts divorce and family law, see the divorce and family law page of my law firm website.
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
Judicial Guidelines Updated for Abuse Prevention Orders
The Massachusetts trial court system has issued the fourth edition of Guidelines for Judicial Practice: Abuse Prevention Proceedings. The updated guidelines reflect a number of substantive and procedural changes, and reflect changes in statutory and case law since the guidelines were last revised in 2000. Hat tip to Massachusetts Law Updates.
For information about Massachusetts divorce and family law, see the divorce and family law page of my law firm website.
For information about Massachusetts divorce and family law, see the divorce and family law page of my law firm website.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












