If this is just about Mitt's testimony that Tom Stemberg was a good father, we probably don't have much of a story. On the other hand, if TMZ's reports are true that Mitt also falsely testified under oath that Staples was worth virtually nothing to aid his friend in misleading the court in order to reduce a payout to his exwife, then we may have a real story, an October surprise of sorts.
This may be the most excitement we have seen in the Norfolk Probate and Family Court since Bobby Brown's arrests here for contempt on child support arrears. (I don't count the matter of the other Massachusetts Presidential candidate, John Kerry, who tried unsuccessfully, in 1995, to seal records here of his 1988 divorce to his first wife, as the facts of that case are rather boring.)
If TMZ's report about Mitt is accurate, and his testimony becomes unsealed, this could be significant news. As we all know, from the most recent Clinton and Bush terms, a President's lying to Congress, the American people, and the United Nations about reasons for going to war is one thing. But lying under oath before becoming President, in a deposition or trial, in a private civil case, such as a divorce or sex discrimination suit, is quite another. It's absolutely unthinkable and disqualifies one from the very important job of lying about wars with absolute impunity and immunity.
For information about Massachusetts divorce and family law, see the divorce and family law page of my law firm website.